ICD-10 is coming to US healthcare in 2013. CMS has created a nice summary of the motivation for shifting to ICD-10 and some examples of the changes.
There are pros and cons on many fronts around shifting to ICD-10. From an integration standpoint, most codes are carried in HL7 as a CE data type. This means that HL7 is by-and-large “already prepared” for ICD-10.
The real work will be in end user applications and, IMO, in the user experience of selecting much more specific codes. In short, ICD-10 provides pre-coordinated codes and ultimately suffers from inconsistency in code construction — this will make the GUI design and selection process very ugly indeed.For example, Pressure ulcer codes go from a choice of 9 to a choice of 125.
Rich Elmore discusses the “large code set problem” in a 2008 blog posting where he uses the example of a simple code (“insect bite”) and compares ICD-9 and ICD-10. Coding this simple example is much harder in ICD-10.
- ICD-10 Overview Site - CMS: Nice summary of ICD-10 changes
- More painful than an insect bite? ICD-10 cost-benefit for healthcare providers: Rich Elmore provides example comparing ICD-9 and ICD-10 insect bite codes
Latest posts by Dave Shaver (see all)
- HL7 ADT Q&A with Dave Shaver - July 2, 2014
- Health Standards Community Membership Archetypes: Who uses HL7? - August 6, 2013
- Note from the Field: Meditech 6.0 HL7 Integration - September 6, 2011